Why the study?
Does 6% hetastarch reduce the incidence of hypotension compared to lactated Ringer's solution in women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia?
Does 6% hetastarch reduce the incidence of hypotension compared to lactated Ringer's solution in women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia?
Preloading with 6% hetastarch significantly reduces the incidence of hypotension compared to lactated Ringer's solution during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section.
Supports hetastarch preloading to lower hypotension risk in cesarean spinal anesthesia; confirms RCT benefit over lactated Ringer's.
BACKGROUND: Regional anesthesia has been the choice of preference for elective cesarean sections. This study was designed to determine whether preoperative administration of 6% hetastarch decreases the incidence of hypotension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 50 nonlaboring American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II women undergoing elective cesarean section. Patients were randomly divided into two groups and were preloaded either with 1000 ml Ringer's lactate (RL) or 500 ml of 6% hetastarch 30 min prior to the surgery. Spinal anesthesia was performed with patients in the left lateral position and 2 cc (10 mg) of 0.5% of bupivacaine injected into subarachnoid space. Hemodynamic variables (heart rate, noninvasive blood pressure, and SpO2) were recorded from prior to preloading until the recovery from the subarachnoid blockade. RESULTS: Our study showed the incidence of hypotension to be 28% in the hetastarch group and 80% in the RL group. Rescue ephedrine requirements for the treatment of hypotension were significantly less in patients who were preloaded with 6% hetastarch prior to cesarean section. The neonatal outcome, as determined by Apgar scores was good and similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Hence, we conclude that 6% hydroxyl ethyl starch is more effective than lactated Ringers solution and that its routine use for preloading prior to spinal anesthesia should be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhat et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: