Why the study?
Does arterial pressure waveform analysis reliably predict fluid responsiveness in patients during anesthesia and intensive care?
Does arterial pressure waveform analysis reliably predict fluid responsiveness in patients during anesthesia and intensive care?
Arterial pressure waveform analysis provides reliable functional hemodynamic parameters for predicting fluid responsiveness and optimizing perioperative fluid management.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide fluid decisions in anesthesia and ICU; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm outcome benefits.
Predicting the effects of volume expansion on cardiac output and oxygen delivery is of major importance in different clinical scenarios. Functional hemodynamic parameters based on pulse waveform analysis, which are relying on the effects of mechanical ventilation on stroke volume and its surrogates, have been shown to be reliable predictors of fluid responsiveness during anesthesia and intensive care unit treatment, as demonstrated by several clinical studies and meta-analyses. However, different limitations of these parameters have to be considered when they are used in clinical practice. Today, they can be continuously and automatically monitored by a variety of commercially available devices. These parameters have been introduced into the concept of perioperative fluid management and hemodynamic optimization - an approach that may positively impact postoperative patients' outcomes. In this article, technical aspects of the assessment of the functional hemodynamic parameters derived from pulse waveform analysis are summarized, emphasizing their advantages, limitations and potential applications, primarily in a perioperative setting in order to improve patient outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cannesson et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: