Key result
Prism Adaptation Treatment is linked to improved line bisection at 1 year despite persistent spatial neglect.
Observational (n=9)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Follow-up study reports sustained spatial improvements after prism adaptation treatment in stroke survivors, highlighting selective long-term benefits.
This study assessed nine participants, who sustained multiple strokes and had spatial neglect, one year after participation in a prior trial on whether Prism Adaptation Treatment (PAT) was a feasible and effective treatment for spatial neglect remediation compared to standard care. The objectives were to: (1) describe the sample, (2) measure the degree of spatial neglect symptoms if present, and (3) determine group differences in motor and spatial performance. Three (60%) participants from the PAT group and two (50%) from the comparison group still displayed spatial neglect. A series of two-way mixed ANOVAs exploring group (PAT vs. comparison of standard care) and time effects (pretest vs. posttest vs. follow-up) found a main effect of time for all participants on the Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment (F(1,2) = 30.28, p<.001), Functional Independence Measure (F(1,2) = 16.998, p<.001), and star cancelation (F(1,2) = 11.077, p<.001). An interaction effect of time*prism was observed when assessing the line bisection test (F(1,2) = 6.986, p = .008), suggesting that the PAT group performed significantly better on this test. Additional research should be completed with a larger sample in order to better understand the PAT long term effects as well as develop clinical recommendations for occupational therapy practitioners.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hreha et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Spatial neglect following multiple strokes (n=9). Prism Adaptation Treatment (PAT) vs. Standard care was evaluated on Presence of spatial neglect and performance on line bisection test at 1 year (F(1,2) = 6.986, p=0.008). Prism Adaptation Treatment showed a significant time-by-group interaction on the line bisection test at 1 year (F(1,2)=6.986), while still had spatial neglect.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: