A drying system incorporating a commercial 2.3 kW heat pump dehumidifier was designed and constructed. The HPD was equipped with an external water-cooled condenser that rejected excess heat out of the system. The design of the system allowed for conducting drying with recirculation of air as well as use of electrical heaters. In an open mode, the drying could be carried out simultaneously with room dehumidification and water heating in the secondary condenser. Drying experiments were conducted with apple and comparisons were made between HPD assisted drying (partial and complete) and hot air drying (at 45 and 65°C). The HPD dried fruit exhibited better rehydration properties than the hot air dried samples. Water activity of the HPD dried samples was noticeably lower than that of the hot air dried samples at the same water content, indicating that the residual moisture was probably held under higher tension in the former. In terms of energy consumption, the process of HPD assisted drying is more expensive as much of the energy input is rejected at the secondary condenser as excess heat.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sosle et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: