Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
5ummary -Membrane hydraulic resistance (Rm) for the same nominal M14 Carbosep membrane (pore diameter 0.14 um) was found to vary significantly from 0.85 0.05 to 1.22 0.09 1012 m-1. Pretreated whey microfiltration experiments carried out using these new membranes resulted in shorter operating time and lower protein transmission for the low Rm membranes. When the same membrane was used new, irreversibly fouled or cleaned (Rm = 1.14, 2.48and 1.261012 m-1 respectively) fouling evolution was positively correlated with Rm increase. It was assumed that a low Rm of a new membrane indicated a larger population of large pores which under constant permeation flux experiments filtered larger volumes and thus fouled faster. Residual fouling after c1eaning was found to have a negative effect on performance presumably due to alteration of the membrane's morphological characteristics and to electrostatic and hydrophobie interactions of the feed stream with the residual fouling layer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gésan-Guiziou et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: