Ab initio molecular orbital calculations have been carried out on benzo[ b ]thiophene (BT), 2-methylbenzo[ b ]thiophene (2-MeBT), 3-methylbenzo[ b ]thiophene (3-MeBT), and a number of organometallic complexes containing these thiophenic moieties in an attempt to understand the usual preference for insertion of metal fragments into the sulfur−carbon(vinyl) bond of BT and the recent observations of insertion into the sulfur−carbon(aryl) bond. The results indicate that insertion selectivity is governed by several factors, including the orbital structure of BT, steric interactions between the metal and the heterocycle, and the metal−carbon bond strengths of the inserted products. In most cases, all three factors support the experimentally observed preference for insertion into the S−C(vinyl) bond. Subtle structural changes, however, can lead to S−C(aryl) metal-inserted products. For instance, steric factors inhibiting insertion of metal fragments into the sulfur−carbon(aryl) bond of BT can be overcome by “tied back” or relatively small metal fragments. In addition, the strength of the metal−carbon bond of the inserted product, which appears to be a determining factor leading to the otherwise unexpected sulfur−carbon(aryl) metal-inserted adducts, can be influenced by derivatizing BT or coordinating metals to the arene ring of BT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palmer et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: