Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Scientists, risk practitioners, and regulators have debated the need to be proactive in assessing the potential health and environmental risks and benefits of unregulated nano-scale technologies. Many nanotech-based products and applications are already in use or development. Application of a proactive risk-based approach that considers the life cycle of the product, rather than a precautionary principle approach that would likely restrict the progress and advance of nanoscience, will be useful in helping to assess the unknown and unpredictable risks associated with nano-products, nanotoxicity, and nanopollution. This article summarizes what is currently known regarding the potential toxicity and hazards of nanomaterials. A life-cycle perspective is used to identify important areas for further consideration and research. A conceptual framework is proposed for linking the strategies of life cycle and risk analysis within the same toolbox. This approach allows for prevention and treatment of a material's life-cycle risks, which can be considered in an integrated manner, thereby promoting continuous improvement, proactive risk reduction, and a flexible and adaptive approach to evaluating nanotechnology without stifling innovation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sweet et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: