Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
All complex devices in rapid single flux quantum (RSFQ) technique work at much lower clock rates than possible for simple cells. New data driven self timed or asynchronous concepts can reduce this gap, but even in this case still a discrepancy between simulation and experiment is shown. It has been pointed out in previous studies, that the influence of thermal fluctuations in RSFQ circuits is divided into static and dynamic switching bit errors as well as timing jitter induced failures. The bit error rate depends exponentially on the temperature and is not the main issue in the low temperature technique. Our last results show for the first time, that the variance of the switching time is much slower decreased by reducing the temperature and is still important at 4.2 K. We describe a general method for calculating the switching time distribution for RSFQ cells. Furthermore, we present detailed results for a timing analysis of a dc/SFQ-converter. The delay between output signal and the input current ramp shows a variation over 1 ps which is more than 10% of the switching time itself. This new understanding of the background of timing jitter enables a goal-oriented improvement in the design process of RSFQ circuits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ortlepp et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: