PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1992Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine16 citations

The role of dipyridamole in addition to low dose aspirin in the prevention of occlusion of coronary artery bypass grafts

View Full Paper
TAT. M. AgnewAuckland City HospitalJFJ. FrenchInterventional CardiologyAKA. KerrUniversity of Manchester

Structured PICO

Does the addition of dipyridamole to low dose aspirin improve vein graft patency in subjects undergoing coronary bypass surgery?

P
Population
101 subjects undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery
I
Intervention
Aspirin 100 mg + dipyridamole 300 mg daily, commenced at least 36 hours before operation
C
Comparator
Aspirin 100 mg daily, commenced at least 36 hours before operation
O
Outcome
Vein graft patency rates at nine weeks and one year assessed by cineangiocardiogramssurrogate

Adding dipyridamole to low-dose aspirin does not improve vein graft patency after coronary bypass surgery and is associated with worse tolerability.

Abstract

One hundred and one subjects were randomised to receive either aspirin 100 mg or aspirin 100 mg + dipyridamole 300 mg daily before undergoing coronary bypass surgery. The drugs were commenced at least 36 hours before operation and patients were followed for one year. There were three perioperative deaths and 37 withdrawals, of which 14 were drug related (aspirin four, aspirin + dipyridamole ten). Cineangiocardiograms at nine weeks and one year showed vein graft patency rates of 93% and 87% for subjects treated with aspirin alone; and 90% and 89% in those who received aspirin+dipyridamole. During the follow-up period 14% of 232 coronary lesions in the aspirin treated group advanced by more than two grades compared with 15% of 315 lesions in the aspirin+dipyridamole group. The study did not establish superiority of one regimen over another in terms of graft patency or progress of lesions in native vessels. However, low dose aspirin was better tolerated than combination therapy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Agnew et al. (1992) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a82a5a33096299d011c287ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.1992.tb04868.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Platelet-Inhibitor-Drug Trial in Coronary-Artery Bypass Operations1982 · 545 citations
  2. 2Antiplatelet or Anticoagulant Therapy after Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery1989 · 75 citations
  3. 3Improvement in early saphenous vein graft patency after coronary artery bypass surgery with antiplatelet therapy: results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study.1988 · 433 citations
  4. 4Improved graft patency in patients treated with platelet-inhibiting therapy after coronary bypass surgery.1985 · 169 citations
  5. 5Role of platelets and platelet inhibitors in aortocoronary artery vein-graft disease.1986 · 132 citations