Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have reviewed our experience with conversion to tacrolimus after 435 liver transplantations. Tacrolimus was administered as a rescue agent in 33 patients until October 1993. Indications for rescue therapy were: cholestatic forms of severe, steroid-resistant cellular rejection (n= 8), OKT3-resistant cellular rejections (n= 6), cellular rejections in patients suffering from cyclosporin malabsorption (n= 4), late onset cellular rejections (n= 4), early chronic rejections (n= 3), and chronic vascular or ductopenic rejections (n= 8). Response was evident in 29 of the 33 patients (88 %), whereas 4 patients (12 %) were nonresponsive. Patient and graft survival were 76 % and 70 %, respectively. Graft loss with or without patient death occurred in three of eight patients suffering from severe, steroid-resistant cellular rejection, in two of six patients with OKT3-resistant cellular rejections, and in five of eight patients undergoing chronic rejection. In severe steroid-resistant cellular rejection, successful tacrolimus rescue therapy corresponded to a significantly lower total serum bilirubin than unsuccessful therapy (12.0 ± 5.6 mg% vs 29.7 ± 5.9 mg%, P < 0.05). We conclude that tacrolimus rescue therapy is a safe and efficient alternative for high-risk cases that do not respond to conservative treatment. In severe, steroid-resistant cellular rejection and in chronic ductopenic rejection, conversion to tacrolimus is beneficial only in a limited number of cases. A predictive parameter, which total serum bilirubin may prove to be in severe, steroid-resistant cellular rejection, is needed to select those cases that might benefit more from retrans-plantation than from conversion to tacrolimus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonas et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: