Why the study?
This study sought to explore possible risk factors assessed with MR vessel wall imaging for hemodynamic instability during CAS.
Do vulnerable carotid plaque characteristics on MR vessel wall imaging predict hemodynamic instability during carotid artery stenting in patients with carotid stenosis?
Do vulnerable carotid plaque characteristics on MR vessel wall imaging predict hemodynamic instability during carotid artery stenting in patients with carotid stenosis?
Larger lipid-rich necrotic core volume on MR vessel wall imaging may predict hemodynamic instability during carotid artery stenting.
May inform pre-stenting MR risk assessment; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background: This cross-sectional study sought to explore the possible risk factors assessed with magnetic resonance (MR) vessel wall imaging for hemodynamic instability (HI) during carotid artery stenting (CAS). Methods: Patients with carotid stenosis who were referred for CAS from January 2017 to December 2019 were recruited and underwent carotid MR vessel wall imaging. The vulnerable plaque features, including lipid-rich necrotic core (LRNC), intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), fibrous cap rupture, and plaque morphology, were evaluated. The HI was defined as a drop of systolic blood pressure (SBP) of ≥30 mmHg or the lowest SBP measurement of <90 mmHg after stent implantation. The carotid plaque characteristics were compared between the HI and non-HI groups. The association between carotid plaque characteristics and HI was analyzed. Results: ; P=0.001] in carotid plaque compared to those in non-HI group (n=30, 54%). Carotid LRNC volume (OR =1.005, 95% CI: 1.001-1.009; P=0.01) and presence of vulnerable plaque (OR =4.038, 95% CI: 0.955-17.070; P=0.06) were significantly and marginally associated with HI, respectively. Conclusions: Carotid plaque burden and vulnerable plaque features, particularly a larger LRNC, might be effective predictors for HI during the CAS procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: