Key result
Hypertension (OR 2.037), right-sided lesions (OR 3.090), and calcified plaques (OR 2.195) were significant predictors of periprocedural hemodynamic instability during carotid artery stenting.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to identify predictors of hemodynamic instability related to carotid artery stenting and to evaluate its association with periprocedural adverse outcomes.
What are the predictors of hemodynamic instability during carotid artery stenting, and does it affect periprocedural adverse outcomes?
Cohort (n=728)
What are the predictors of hemodynamic instability during carotid artery stenting, and does it affect periprocedural adverse outcomes?
Odds Ratio: 2.037 (95% CI 1.292–3.211)
p-value: p=0.0022
Hemodynamic instability is common during carotid artery stenting and is predicted by factors such as hypertension and right-sided lesions, but it does not appear to increase the risk of periprocedural morbidity or mortality.
Hypertension may warrant closer HI monitoring in carotid procedures; leaves open whether targeted prophylaxis improves outcomes.
Background: To address the predictors of hemodynamic instability (HI) related to carotid artery stenting (CAS) and evaluate the association between HI and periprocedural adverse outcomes. Methods: This study comprised all consecutive patients who underwent CAS for atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis from March 2014 to May 2018. A standardized dose of atropine (0.4 mg) was given prior to stent deployment. Changes in heart rate, blood pressure, and neurological status were monitored and recorded. Potential predictors of HI were tested in multivariate analysis using binary logistic regression model. Results: A total of 728 patients were enrolled. Two hundred twenty seven patients (31.2%) developed periprocedural HI. The presence of hypertension (OR, 2.037; 95% CI, 1.292-3.211; P = 0.0022), symptomatic carotid lesions (OR, 1.704; 95% CI, 1.057-2.747; P = 0.0287), right sided lesions (OR, 3.090; 95% CI, 1.934-4.935; P ≤ 0.0001), hyperechoic/calcified plaques (OR, 2.195; 95% CI, 1.458-3.304; p P = 0.0002), and longer lesions (OR, 1.043; 95% CI, 1.012-1.076; P = 0.0072) were significant predictable factors for the occurrence of HI. On the other hand, smoking was significantly associated with a 48.1% decrease in risk of development of HI (OR, 0.519; 95% CI, 0.358-0.754; P = 0.0006). There were no statistically significant differences in periprocedural morbidity or mortality between patients with and without HI. Conclusion: HI occurs in a considerable percentage of patients undergoing CAS. Hypertension, right sided, symptomatic carotid lesions, calcified plaques, and longer lesions were shown to be independent risk factors for the development of periprocedural HI. Conversely, smoking demonstrated a protective effect. HI did not appear to predispose to periprocedural adverse events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saleh et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis (n=728). Risk factors (hypertension, right-sided lesions, symptomatic lesions, calcified plaques, longer lesions) vs. Absence of risk factors was evaluated on Periprocedural hemodynamic instability (HI) (OR 2.037, 95% CI 1.292-3.211, p=0.0022). Hypertension (OR 2.037), right-sided lesions (OR 3.090), and calcified plaques (OR 2.195) were significant predictors of periprocedural hemodynamic instability during carotid artery stenting.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: