Why the study?
Does enflurane improve induction and recovery times compared to halothane in paediatric outpatient anaesthesia?
Does enflurane improve induction and recovery times compared to halothane in paediatric outpatient anaesthesia?
Enflurane provides a shorter recovery time than halothane in paediatric outpatient anaesthesia, though this may be partially explained by a less potent anaesthetic dose being administered.
Enflurane was associated with shorter recovery in paediatric outpatients; observational data leave open dose confounding and need for RCTs.
Two groups of paediatric patients, consisting of 40 patients each, were studied with regard to anaesthesia induction and recovery. Group H was given halothane and Group E received enflurane. The induction time was similar for the two groups. Enflurane had, on average, a shorter recovery time (17 +/- 4 min) than halothane (26 +/- 4min) (P less than 0.05). The mean dose of anaesthetic given, expressed as the product of inspired concentration times minute ventilation, was 2.3 +/- 0.2 1 100% halothane and 2.8 +/- 0.2 1 100% enflurane. If one assumes that the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) value for enflurane twice that of halothane, group E received a less potent anaesthetic dose. This might explain the similar induction times, and, in part, the shorter recovery time for enflurane in this study. No difference was noted between the two agents with regard to post-operative nausea and vomiting or restlessness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sally H. Davidson (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: