Why the study?
Does MRI measurement of aortic velocity and acceleration accurately estimate left ventricular dp/dt compared to invasive transducer measurements?
Does MRI measurement of aortic velocity and acceleration accurately estimate left ventricular dp/dt compared to invasive transducer measurements?
MRI measurements of velocity and acceleration in the ascending aorta provide a noninvasive method to estimate aortic dp/dt, which correlates well with invasive measurements of global myocardial contractility.
May support noninvasive LV contractility estimation; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
PURPOSE: To describe a method for assessing pressure variation vs. time (dp/dt) using blood flow acceleration measured by MRI, and to demonstrate its applicability in estimating left ventricular (LV) function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The method was tested in vitro using a pulsatile phantom, and a strong correlation was found between transducer and MRI determinations of dp/dt (r = 0.98). Selected aortic flow parameters were then measured in 10 patients and the results were compared with transducer measurements of the LV dp/dt. RESULTS: The correlation coefficients for the reference estimations of global myocardial function and MRI were 0.59 for aortic velocity, 0.74 for aortic acceleration, and 0.86 for aortic dp/dt. CONCLUSION: MR measurements of velocity and acceleration within the ascending aorta offer a noninvasive method for determining indices, such as the aortic dp/dt, that are closely correlated with the global myocardial contractility function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tasu et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: