High-frequency echocardiography enables detailed evaluation of ventricular systolic and diastolic function in small animal models, facilitating translational research.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports refined preclinical cardiovascular models; leaves open prospective human validation before clinical adoption.
Echocardiography is an invaluable tool for characterizing cardiac structure and function in vivo. Technological advances in high-frequency ultrasound over the past 3 decades have increased spatial and temporal resolution, and facilitated many important clinical and basic science discoveries. Successful reverse translation of established echocardiographic techniques, including M-mode, B-mode, color Doppler, pulsed-wave Doppler, tissue Doppler and, most recently, myocardial deformation imaging, from clinical cardiology into the basic science laboratory has enabled researchers to achieve a deeper understanding of myocardial phenotypes in health and disease. With high-frequency echocardiography, detailed evaluation of ventricular systolic function in a range of small animal models is now possible. Furthermore, improvements in frame rate and the advent of diastolic strain rate imaging, when coupled with the use of select pulsed-wave Doppler parameters, such as isovolumic relaxation time and E wave deceleration, have enabled nuanced interpretation of ventricular diastolic function. Comparing pulsed-wave Doppler indices of atrioventricular inflow during early and late diastole with parameters that describe the simultaneous myocardial deformation (e.g., tissue Doppler é and á, global longitudinal strain rate and global longitudinal velocity) may yield additional insights related to myocardial compliance. This review will provide a historical perspective of the development of high-frequency echocardiography and consider how ongoing innovation will help future-proof this important imaging modality for 21st century translational research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: