Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No AccessAmerican Journal of AudiologyClinical Focus: Innovation1 Mar 1994Procedure for Predicting Real-Ear Hearing Aid Performance in Young Children K. Shane Moodie, MClSc Richard C. Seewald and Sheila T. Sinclair K. Shane Moodie Hearing Health Care Research Unit, Department of Communicative Disorders, Elborn College, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 1H1 Google Scholar , Richard C. Seewald Hearing Health Care Research Unit, Department of Communicative Disorders, Elborn College, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 1H1 Google Scholar and Sheila T. Sinclair Hearing Health Care Research Unit, Department of Communicative Disorders, Elborn College, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 1H1 Google Scholar https://doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889.0301.23 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Bentler, R. A., & Pavlovic, C. V. (1989). Transfer functions and correction factors used in hearing aid evaluation and research.Ear and Hearing, 10, 58–63. Google Scholar Byrne, D. (1981). Selective amplification: Some psychoacoustic considerations.In F. H. Bess, B. A. Freeman, & J. S. Sinclair (Eds.), Amplification in education (pp. 260–285). Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf. Google Scholar Byrne, D., & Dillon, H. (1986). The National Acoustic Laboratories (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid.Ear and Hearing, 7, 257–265. Google Scholar Cox, R. M., & Risberg, D. M. (1986). Comparison of in-the-ear and over-the-ear hearing aid fittings.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 362–369. Google Scholar Feigin, J. A., Kopun, J. G., Stelmachowicz, P. G., & Gorga, M. P. (1989). Probe-tube microphone measures of ear-canal sound pressure levels in infants and children.Ear and Hearing, 10, 254–258. Google Scholar Fikret-Pasa, S., & Revit, L. J. (1992). Individualized correction factors in the preselection of hearing aids.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 384–400. Google Scholar Frye, G. J. (1986). High-speed real-time hearing aid analysis.Hearing Journal, 39, 21–26. Google Scholar Hawkins, D. B. (1992). Selecting SSPL90 using probe-microphone measures.In H. G. Mueller, D. B. Hawkins, & J. L. Northern (Eds.), Probe-microphone measurements: Hearing aid selection and assessment (pp. 145–158). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group. Google Scholar Hawkins, D. B., Cooper, W. A., & Thompson, D. J. (1990). Comparisons among SPLs in real ears, 2-cm3 and 6-cm3 couplers.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 1, 154–161. Google Scholar Nelson Barlow, N. L., Auslander, M. C., Rines, D., & Stelmachowicz, P. G. (1988). Probe-tube microphone measures in hearing-impaired children.Ear and Hearing, 9, 243–247. Google Scholar Revit, L. (1991). New tests for signal-processing and multichannel hearing instruments.Hearing Journal, 44, 20–23. Google Scholar Sachs, R. M., & Burkhard, M. D. (1972). Earphone pressure response in ears and couplers.In H. Levitt, J. M. Pickett, & R. A. Houde (Eds.), Sensory aids for the hearing impaired (pp. 130–134). New York: IEEE Press. Google Scholar Seewald, R. C. (1992). The desired sensation level method for fitting children: Version 3.0.Hearing Journal, 45, 36–41. Google Scholar Seewald, R. C., Ross, M., & Spiro, M. K. (1985). Selecting amplification characteristics for young hearing-impaired children.Ear and Hearing, 6, 48–53. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Seewald, R. C., Zelisko, D. L. C., Ramji, K. V., & Jamieson, D. G. (1991). Computer-assisted implementation of the desired sensation level method for electroacoustic selection and fitting in children: User's manual. London, ON: University of Western Ontario. Google Scholar Skinner, M. W., Pascoe, D. P., Miller, J. A., & Popelka, G. R. (1982). Measurements to determine the optimal placement of speech energy within the listener's auditory area: A basis for selecting amplification characteristics.In G. A. Studebaker & F. H. Bess (Eds.), The Vanderbilt hearing aid report (pp. 161–169). Upper Darby, PA: Monographs in Contemporary Audiology. Google Scholar Stelmachowicz, P. G. (1991). Clinical issues related to hearing aid maximum output.In G. Studebaker, F. Bess, & L. Beck (Eds.), The Vanderbilt hearing-aid report II (pp. 141–148). Parkton, MD: York Press. Google Scholar Stelmachowicz, P., Lewis, D., Seewald, R. C., & Hawkins, D. (1990). Complex and pure-tone signals in the evaluation of hearing aid characteristics.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 380–385. Google Scholar Stelmachowicz, P. G., & Seewald, R. C. (1991). Probe-tube microphone measures in children.Seminars in Hearing, 12, 62–72. Google Scholar Sullivan, R. (1987). Aided SSPL90 response in the real ear: A safe estimate.Hearing Instruments, 38, 36. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByAmerican Journal of Audiology24:2 (178-187)1 Jun 2015Modeling the Influence of Acoustic Coupling of Hearing Aids on FM Signal-to-Noise RatioLinda W. Norrix, Dianne Van Tasell, Jessie Ross, Frances P. Harris and James DeanAmerican Journal of Audiology22:1 (190-199)1 Jun 2013Effects of Tubing Length and Coupling Method on Hearing Threshold and Real-Ear to Coupler Difference MeasuresSamantha Gustafson, Andrea Pittman and Robert FanningAmerican Journal of Audiology15:2 (141-153)1 Dec 2006Audibility and Speech Perception of Children Using Wide Dynamic Range Compression Hearing AidsLisa S. Davidson and Margaret W. SkinnerAmerican Journal of Audiology13:2 (144-157)1 Dec 2004Most Comfortable and Uncomfortable Loudness LevelsJerry Punch, Antony Joseph and Brad RakerdAmerican Journal of Audiology8:2 (143-152)1 Dec 1999Predictive Validity of a Procedure for Pediatric Hearing Instrument FittingRichard C. Seewald, K. Shane Moodie, Sheila T. Sinclair and Susan D. ScollieAmerican Journal of Audiology7:1 (5-13)1 Mar 1998Guidelines for Hearing Aid Fitting for AdultsJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research41:1 (S61-S84)1 Feb 1998Treatment EfficacyArlene Earley Carney and Mary Pat MoellerAmerican Journal of Audiology5:1 (53-68)1 Mar 1996Amplification for Infants and Children With Hearing LossFred H. BessAmerican Journal of Audiology5:3 (52-56)1 Nov 1996Repeatability of a Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference Measurement as a Function of AgeSheila T. Sinclair, Kathryn L. Beauchaine, K. Shane Moodie, Judith A. Feigin, Richard C. Seewald and Patricia G. StelmachowiczAmerican Journal of Audiology4:1 (43-45)1 Mar 1995Impact of "Standard" Earmold on RECDTodd A. Ricketts and Ruth A. Bentler Volume 3Issue 1March 1994Pages: 23-31 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library HistoryReceived: Jan 21, 1993Accepted: Oct 28, 1993 Published in issue: Mar 1, 1994 Metrics Downloaded 65 times Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesKeywordschildrenreal-ear measurementhearing aidsCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 1994 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF DownloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moodie et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: