Why the study?
Studies linking mindfulness and meditation-based interventions to HRV improvements have yielded mixed findings, and no comprehensive meta-analysis had synthesized these results.
Do mindfulness and meditation-based interventions improve resting-state vagally mediated heart rate variability compared to control conditions?
Do mindfulness and meditation-based interventions improve resting-state vagally mediated heart rate variability compared to control conditions?
A meta-analysis of 19 RCTs found insufficient evidence that mindfulness and meditation-based interventions significantly improve vagally mediated heart rate variability.
MBIs lack support for improving vagally mediated HRV; challenges assumptions of autonomic benefits from mindfulness in prior reports.
OBJECTIVE: Heart rate variability (HRV) is a marker of autonomic nervous system function associated with both physical and mental health. Many studies have suggested that mindfulness and meditation-based interventions (MBIs) are associated with improvements in HRV, but findings are mixed, and to date, no comprehensive meta-analysis has synthesized results. METHODS: Systematic literature searches were conducted using PsycINFO, Embase, Medline, CINAHL, ERIC, and Scopus to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of predominantly seated MBIs on resting-state vagally mediated HRV. Risk of bias was judged using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. RESULTS: Nineteen RCTs met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Random-effects meta-analysis found that MBIs were not efficacious in increasing vagally mediated resting-state HRV relative to control conditions (Hedges g = 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.014 to 0.77). When removing an outlier (g = 3.22), the effect size was reduced, CI narrowed, and findings remained nonsignificant (g = 0.19, 95% CI = -0.02 to 0.39). High heterogeneity in results (I2 = 89.12%) could not be explained by a priori-determined moderators including intervention duration, study setting, and control type. CONCLUSIONS: There is currently insufficient evidence to indicate that MBIs lead to improvements in vagally mediated HRV over control conditions. Future large, well-designed RCTs with low risk of methodological bias could help add to the current evidence to elucidate any role MBIs might play in impacting HRV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brown et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: