Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates that single-subject morphological networks reflect post-stroke deficits and predict functional recovery, highlighting their potential for monitoring neurorehabilitation.
BACKGROUND The single-subject morphological network (SSMN) provides a new approach for constructing structural connectome. However, its clinical relevance in post-stroke deficits and recovery remains unexplored. METHODS This study utilized high-resolution 3D T1-weighted images alongside behavioral and cognitive assessments across multiple domains, including language, motor, memory, and attention, collected at two weeks, three months, and one year post-stroke. The SSMN was constructed using the AAL atlas by evaluating the similarities of regional probability density derived from gray matter volume. Network disconnection and the disconnectome were evaluated by examining changes in network edges and global topological properties. The functional relevance of the SSMN was explored through its associations with post-stroke behavioral and cognitive deficits and recovery, as well as by developing machine-learning-based prediction models. RESULTS The findings revealed that the SSMN was sensitive to post-stroke connectional and connectomal disruptions. Domain-specific disruptions in the SSMN were predictable of post-stroke deficits, with correlation pattern aligning with the neurobiological substrates of each domain. Furthermore, the predictive performance of SSMN-based models was comparable to that of other imaging modalities. Notably, normalization of the SSMN within one year post-stroke was significantly associated with functional recovery. CONCLUSIONS These results highlight the potential of the SSMN as a novel structural imaging modality for evaluating post-stroke deficits and recovery, offering valuable insights into the neurobiological mechanisms of rehabilitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: