Why the study?
Is the risk for cardiovascular disease increased in all phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome?
Is the risk for cardiovascular disease increased in all phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome?
Screening for primary CVD prevention in young women with PCOS phenotypes C and D may not be cost-effective, suggesting a need to refine risk stratification using classical criteria plus metabolic parameters.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May not warrant routine CVD screening in PCOS phenotypes C/D; leaves open prospective validation of phenotype-specific risk.
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common disorder in women of reproductive age, affecting around 10% of them. Polycystic ovary syndrome is considered to be related to increased risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). There are 2 definitions for PCOS: one adopted in 1990 (classical PCOS with phenotypes A and B) and the other in 2003 (Rotterdam criteria with 4 phenotypes A to D). The latter is a wider definition including the 1990 phenotypes. There is mounting data suggesting that phenotypes C and D are not actually related to increased CVD risk, and thus screening for CVD risk factors of intervening for primary CVD prevention in young women is not cost-effective. There is an increasing number of suggestions to return to the 1990 criteria plus some metabolic parameters to identify real CVD risk in this population. However, such a strategy needs verification by large, prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Δασκαλόπουλος et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: