Why the study?
Does pre-heparin plasma LPL mass correlate with intra-abdominal visceral fat accumulation in hyperlipidemic and normolipidemic subjects?
Does pre-heparin plasma LPL mass correlate with intra-abdominal visceral fat accumulation in hyperlipidemic and normolipidemic subjects?
Pre-heparin plasma LPL mass is inversely associated with intra-abdominal visceral fat accumulation, suggesting its measurement may provide useful information regarding metabolic disorders.
Pre-heparin LPL mass inversely associated with visceral fat; hypothesis-generating for metabolic risk assessment pending prospective studies.
OBJECTIVE: To determine how lipoprotein lipase mass in the pre-heparin plasma is affected by body fat distribution, which is known to be closely related to lipid disorder, either directly or through insulin resistance. SUBJECTS: A total of 57 subjects consisting of 50 hyperlipidemic and 7 normolipidemic subjects (age 54 +/- IIy; 31 men, 26 women; body mass index 24+/- 2.5 kg/m2; serum total cholesterol 6.4+/-1.5 mmol/l; triglycerides, 2.4 +/- 1.7 mmol/l; HDL-cholesterol 1.3 +/- 0.5 mmol/l) were enrolled. MEASUREMENTS: We investigated the correlation between pre-heparin plasma LPL mass and intra-abdominal visceral fat area (or subcutaneous fat area) evaluated by computed tomography, and serum lipids and lipoproteins. RESULTS: Pre-heparin plasma LPL mass correlated inversely against intra-abdominal visceral fat area (r = - 0.51, p < 0.0001) and body mass index (r = - 0.46, p = 0.0003), but did not show any significant correlation with subcutaneous fat area. Pre-heparin plasma LPL mass had a positive correlation with serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol (r = 0.45, p = 0.0004) and a negative correlation against serum triglycerides (r = - 0.48, p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-heparin plasma LPL mass is closely associated with intra-abdominal fat distribution, and the measurement of its value gives useful information concerning metabolic disorder.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kobayashi et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: