The relationship between film-makers who create and spectators who judge film is the focal point of this paper. It examines theoretically how these two positions co-exist inside a film-maker that can be supported through critical and conceptual creative practice frameworks. By drawing on filmology, an early film studies area of scholarship, original film theory elements will be re-framed. For example, the filmic terms ‘diegesis’ and ‘spectator’ are central to film theory and pedagogy but ‘creator’, ‘afilmic’, ‘profilmic’, ‘screenic’ and ‘filmographic’ are not frequently used. A re-framing of the filmology suggests another way for the film-maker and spectator to co-exist as a filmic agent who produces creative practices through film-making structures and production contexts. Spectatorship provides one component of the knowledge, skill and practice required for a film-maker to work creatively in a system. Other systemic components that co-exist with spectatorship are the practical, logistical and networking skills required to conceptualize, finance, execute and distribute a film. The Systems View of Creative Practice provides one theoretical explanation where the filmic agent can hold knowledge of both film-making and spectating that enables them to make decisions inside temporal filmic structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Susan Kerrigan (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: