Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We report the relation between the structural and electrochemical properties of N, N -dimethylformamide (DMF)-based electrolytes containing lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)amide (LiTFSA) in the concentration range c Li = 0–3.2 mol dm –3 . Raman spectroscopy and DFT calculations indicate that Li + ions are solvated by DMF molecules in the form of [Li(DMF) 4 ] + complexes at low c Li (<2.0 mol dm –3, LiTFSA:DMF = 1:4 by mol), whereas the coordination of TFSA – anions to Li + ions occurs and gradually increases as c Li increases above 2.0 mol dm –3 . Quantitative Raman data analysis reveals that TFSA – anions coordinate with Li + ions in a monodentate manner (mono-TFSA) in the c Li range of 2.0–2.5 mol dm –3, and mono-TFSA coexists with TFSAs as a bidentate manner (bi-TFSA) in solutions with c Li > 2.5 mol dm –3 . The high c Li solutions, in which all the DMF molecules solvate to Li + ions (i.e., no DMF remains in the bulk), make the electrochemical window wider; the oxidative stability is enhanced owing to lower HOMO energy levels of solvated DMF molecules relative to those in the bulk. The salt concentration also controls the reductive stability; coordinated TFSA – anions within the Li-ion complexes formed in concentrated solutions affect the LUMO energy levels of the electrolyte. The LUMOs located on the TFSA – anions lead to a preferential reduction of the TFSA component rather than DMF to form a solid electrolyte interphase on graphite negative electrodes, resulting in the Li-ion insertion/desertion into/from graphite in the concentrated solutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fujii et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: