Why the study?
High frame rate echocardiography captures myocardial mechanical waves reflecting tissue properties, but the feasibility of 3D high frame rate echocardiography for estimating mechanical wave velocities in acute myocardial infarction remained to be assessed.
Can 3D high frame rate echocardiography feasibly measure myocardial mechanical wave velocities, and do these velocities differ between patients with acute myocardial infarction and controls?
Can 3D high frame rate echocardiography feasibly measure myocardial mechanical wave velocities, and do these velocities differ between patients with acute myocardial infarction and controls?
3D high frame rate echocardiography is a feasible method for measuring myocardial mechanical wave velocities, which are significantly elevated in infarcted territories of patients with acute myocardial infarction compared to controls.
Supports further investigation of 3D echocardiography for AMI; hypothesis-generating without prospective validation.
Aims High frame rate (HFR) echocardiography captures myocardial mechanical waves (MWs), reflecting critical tissue properties. The aim was to assess the feasibility of 3D HFR echocardiography for estimating MW velocities in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients and to compare MW velocities with those in controls. Methods and results Twenty patients with ST-elevation AMI were included within 48 h of reperfusion therapy. 3D high-quality recordings (∼20 volumes/s) were acquired for myocardial segmentation and 3D HFR recordings (750 volumes/s) for measuring the atrial kick wave propagation velocity. MW velocities were compared with 20 controls. MW velocities were successfully measured in 93% of subjects (17 patients and 20 controls). The segmental feasibility was 97%. Global MW velocities were significantly higher in AMI patients than controls (2.1 ± 0.6 m/s vs. 1.5 ± 0.2 m/s, P < 0.001). Infarcted territories had higher velocities when compared with the corresponding territories in controls: right coronary artery: 1.9 ± 0.7 m/s vs. 1.4 ± 0.3 m/s, P < 0.05; circumflex artery: 3.1 ± 1.5 m/s vs. 1.7 ± 0.4 m/s, P < 0.01; and left anterior descending artery: 1.8 ± 0.5 m/s vs. 1.4 ± 0.2 m/s, P < 0.01. There was a strong correlation between global MW velocities and wall motion score index (r = 0.70, P < 0.001). MW velocities were higher in segments with wall motion abnormalities than in healthy segments (2.3 ± 1.1 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7 m/s, P < 0.001). Conclusion Estimation of MW velocities using 3D HFR echocardiography had excellent feasibility. MW velocities were higher in patients with AMI than in controls, in infarcted compared with healthy territories, and in segments with wall motion abnormalities. Future work should evaluate the clinical value in larger populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Halvorsrød et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: