Key result
Global myocardial work index improves by ~30% at 6 months after reperfused AMI.
Why the study?
The study evaluated the trajectories of echocardiographic myocardial work indices and their associations with LV functional recovery, myocardial viability, and perfusion in reperfused AMI.
Do echocardiographic myocardial work indices predict left ventricular functional recovery and myocardial viability in patients with reperfused ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=31)
No
Do echocardiographic myocardial work indices predict left ventricular functional recovery and myocardial viability in patients with reperfused ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction?
Absolute Event Rate: 1711.97% vs 1317.79%
p-value: p=<0.001
Echocardiographic myocardial work indices reflect the severity of early myocardial injury after AMI and can serve as non-invasive markers for functional recovery and myocardial viability.
Myocardial work index rise may signal LV recovery after reperfused AMI; hypothesis-generating for viability markers, warranting prospective validation.
Introduction We evaluated the trajectories of echocardiographic myocardial work (MW) indices and their associations with left ventricle (LV) functional recovery, myocardial viability, and perfusion in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods Thirty-one patients with a first ST-elevation AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention were prospectively enrolled. Transthoracic echocardiography and [ 15 O]-water positron emission tomography (PET) were performed at a median of 7.7 ± 3.8 days post- intervention (baseline). Global and segmental absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) were assessed using PET, and myocardial segments were graded as viable or non-viable based on perfusable tissue fraction (PTF). Echocardiographic parameters, including LV ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS), myocardial work index (MWI), constructive work (MCW), wasted work (MWW), and work efficiency (MWE), were measured at baseline and at the 6-month follow-up. The myocardial area at risk (AAR) and the remote myocardium were defined based on the culprit coronary artery segment. Results LVEF and GLS remained unchanged between baseline and follow-up. However, global MWI, MCW, and MWE significantly increased, while MWW decreased at the 6 months (all p < 0.05). An increase in MWI, but not MWE, was associated with improvement of LVEF. Neither global MWI nor MWE correlated with global MBF, but were inversely associated with peak levels of troponin T and NT-proBNP. In the AAR, regional MWI and MWE were significantly correlated with regional MBF ( r = 0.53, p = 0.003, and r = 0.59, p < 0.001, respectively) and PTF ( r = 0.41, p = 0.03, and r = 0.65, p < 0.001, respectively). At baseline, segmental MWI and MWE were higher in viable compared to non-viable segments. At 6 months, MWI and MWE increased in viable, but not in non-viable segments. Conclusions Echocardiographic myocardial work indices reflect the severity of myocardial injury early after AMI and may serve as non-invasive markers of functional recovery and myocardial viability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ballo et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (n=31). Reperfused acute myocardial infarction vs. Baseline (median 7.7 days post-intervention) was evaluated on Global myocardial work index (MWI) at 6 months (p=<0.001). In patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction, global myocardial work index significantly increased from 1317.8 mmHg% at baseline to 1712.0 mmHg% at 6 months (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: