Key result
LVGWI outperforms standard tests in advanced heart failure, predicting 5-year cardiovascular mortality with AUC ~0.86.
Why the study?
The authors sought to assess the impact of myocardial work derived from speckle tracking echocardiography in stratifying patients with advanced heart failure by exercise capacity and predicting clinical outcomes.
Does myocardial work evaluation using speckle tracking echocardiography accurately predict 5-year mortality and hospitalization in patients with advanced heart failure?
Cohort (n=114)
Does myocardial work evaluation using speckle tracking echocardiography accurately predict 5-year mortality and hospitalization in patients with advanced heart failure?
Myocardial work parameters, particularly LVGWI, demonstrate high accuracy in predicting 5-year mortality and hospitalization in advanced heart failure patients, outperforming standard echocardiographic, CPET, and RHC parameters.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LVGWI may refine prognostication in advanced HF; leaves open incremental value and need for prospective validation.
Introduction Advanced heart failure (AdvHF) is characterized by persistent symptoms and signs despite maximum tolerated therapy. We aimed, to assess the impact of myocardial work (MW), a new semiautomated technique derived from speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), in stratifying a group of patients with AdvHF according to their exercise capacity and in predicting clinical outcome. Materials and methods We studied 114 patients with AdvHF referred for work-up screening for heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device insertion. All patients had detailed echocardiographic examination with MW evaluation, cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), and right heart catheterization (RHC). Data were divided according to the LVGWI values into two groups: group A included patients with LVGWI <600 mmHg% and group B included patients with values 600 mmHg%. Results the study has shown statistically significant correlations between MW parameter and both CPET and RHC parameters. In particular, LVGWI and LVGCW have manifested statistically relevant correlations with parameters representing systemic perfusion (such as pVO2, %VO2, and AT %VO2), pulmonary pressures (sPAP, dPAP, and PCWP), and pressure-volume loop (VAC and EES). LVGWE only correlated with pVO2, %VO2, VAC, and EES, without any link with pulmonary pressures. Furthermore, LVGWI (p<0.001), LVGCW (p<0.001) and LVGWW (p=0.002) were related to 5-years cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality as well as hospitalization and survival was significantly superior in group B than group A (p<0.001). Finally, LVGWI had the highest accuracy in predicting 5-years CV mortality (AUC=0.856), CV hospitalization (AUC=0.956), all-cause mortality (AUC=0.856), and all-cause hospitalization (AUC=0.896) compared to the rest of the echocardiographic, CPET’s and RHC’s parameters. Conclusions In our study MW has shown higher accuracy than other echocardiographic measurements in predicting clinical events and mortality. However, more trials are necessary for revalidating such measurements accuracy and relevance before they become ready for routine clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martini et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Advanced heart failure (n=114). Left ventricular global work index (LVGWI) ≥600 mmHg% vs. LVGWI <600 mmHg% was evaluated on 5-years cardiovascular mortality (AUC 0.856, p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: