Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In spite of claiming primary prevention as their aim, studies of potential occupational and environmental health hazards that are funded either directly or indirectly by industry are likely to have negative results. The authors present three common scenarios in which faulty design of epidemiologic studies skews results, and list 15 study design flaws that lead to results that are dangerously misleading with regard to both the evaluation and the improvement of public health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gennaro et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: