Why the study?
Does subcutaneous IFN-beta administration alter gene expression kinetics in PBMCs of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis?
Does subcutaneous IFN-beta administration alter gene expression kinetics in PBMCs of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis?
IFN-beta therapy induces rapid, transient, and highly variable gene expression in RRMS patients, involving both pro- and anti-inflammatory genes rather than a simple Th1 to Th2 shift.
High interpatient variability in IFN-beta gene kinetics cautions against uniform dosing; leaves open other response determinants in RRMS.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Interferon-beta (IFN-beta) therapy for MS is hypothesized to cause short-term and long-term changes in gene expression that shift the inflammation from Th1 to Th2. In vivo gene induction to define kinetics of response to IFN-beta therapy in a large cohort of MS patients is described. Differential gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from relapsing-remitting MS patients (RRMS) was assessed using high content microarrays. Rapid onset of gene expression appeared within 4 h of subcutaneous IFN-beta administration, returning to baseline levels at 42 h in clinically stable RRMS. IFN-beta therapy in vivo rapidly but transiently induced strong upregulation of genes mediating immune modulation, IFN signaling, and antiviral responses. RT-PCR showed significant patient-to-patient variation in the magnitude of expression of multiple genes, especially for IFN-beta-inducible genes, such as MxA, IRF7, and CCL8, a Th1 product. Variation among patients in IFN-beta-induced RNA transcription was not explained by neutralizing antibodies or IFN receptor expression. Surprisingly, genes regulated in vivo by IFN-beta therapy do not support a simple Th1 to Th2 shift. A complex interplay between both proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory immune regulatory genes is likely to act in concert in the treatment of RRMS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reder et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: