The purpose of this commentary is to locate the symmetric scaling of intergenerational continuity (SSIC) within a detailed typology of vertical scales. In the course of doing so, we establish that SSIC cannot be seen as a "corrected" prestige or socioeconomic scale, nor is it a convincing proxy for the total assets and resources embedded in occupations. We argue that SSIC might be reinterpreted as the dominant dimension underlying patterns of intergenerational contact; however, some of the competing "network scales" tap a broader range of relational processes, and it would therefore be difficult to salvage a major role for SSIC within this tradition. We conclude by asking whether SSIC should be privileged relative to alternative scales that maximize other bivariate correlations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grusky et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: