Key result
Newer methods for measuring cardiac output lack direct comparison data against the pulmonary artery catheter reference standard in adult donor populations.
Why the study?
Are newer methods of measuring cardiac output accurate compared to pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution in adult donor care?
Are newer methods of measuring cardiac output accurate compared to pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution in adult donor care?
In adult donor care, there is a lack of data comparing newer cardiac output measurement methods to the reference standard, highlighting the need for prospective studies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Newer methods lack validation in adult donors; leaves open accuracy versus pulmonary artery catheter and warrants prospective studies.
Measurement of cardiac output may improve hemodynamic management in donor care. Selected traditional and more recent methods to quantify cardiac output are reviewed. The accuracy or concordance of these newer methods when compared with thermodilution techniques that use a pulmonary artery catheter-the current reference standard-is discussed. Data directly comparing these systems for measuring cardiac output in the donor population are unavailable. However, data from groups of hemodynamically unstable patients favor selection of a measurement method that permits comparison (calibration) with a reference standard. A prospective comparison of all methods against the pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution technique among donors would provide the best data to resolve this clinical and potentially cost-important question.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Powner et al. (2011) conducted a review in Adult donor care. Newer methods to quantify cardiac output vs. Pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution was evaluated. Newer methods for measuring cardiac output lack direct comparison data against the pulmonary artery catheter reference standard in adult donor populations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: