Key result
Semiautomated carotid plaque segmentation cuts processing time ~57% with excellent correlation to manual analysis.
Why the study?
To compare manual segmentation and semiautomated segmentation for the quantification of carotid high-signal plaques using 3D TSE T1-BB VWI.
Does semiautomated segmentation improve reproducibility and reduce analysis time compared to manual segmentation for quantifying cervical carotid high-signal plaque volume on 3D TSE T1-BB VWI?
Observational (n=19)
No
Does semiautomated segmentation improve reproducibility and reduce analysis time compared to manual segmentation for quantifying cervical carotid high-signal plaque volume on 3D TSE T1-BB VWI?
Semiautomated segmentation on 3D TSE T1-BB VWI provides reliable, highly reproducible quantification of unstable carotid high-signal plaque volumes while cutting segmentation time by more than half compared to manual tracing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Semiautomated segmentation may speed reproducible carotid plaque analysis; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
Unstable carotid plaques are visualized as high-signal plaques (HSPs) on 3D turbo spin-echo T1-weighted black-blood vessel wall imaging (3D TSE T1-BB VWI). The purpose of this study was to compare manual segmentation and semiautomated segmentation for the quantification of carotid HSPs using 3D TSE T1-BB VWI. Twenty cervical carotid plaque lesions in 19 patients with a plaque contrast ratio of > 1.3 compared to adjacent muscle were studied. Using the mean voxel value for the adjacent muscle multiplied by 1.3 as a threshold value, the semiautomated software exclusively segmented and measured the HSP volume. Manual and semiautomated HSP volumes were well correlated (r = 0.965). Regarding reproducibility, the inter-rater ICC was 0.959 (bias: 24.63, 95% limit of agreement: −96.07, 146.35) for the manual method and 0.998 (bias: 15.2, 95% limit of agreement: −17.83, 48.23) for the semiautomated method, indicating improved reproducibility by the semiautomated method compared to the manual method. The time required for semiautomated segmentation was significantly shorter than that of manual segmentation times (81.7 ± 7.8 s versus 189.5 ± 49.6 s; p < 0.01). The results obtained in this study demonstrate that the semiautomated segmentation method allows for reliable assessment of the HSP volume in patients with carotid plaque lesions, with reduced time and effort for the analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inoue et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Cervical carotid artery stenosis with unstable high-signal plaques (HSPs) (n=19). Semiautomated segmentation of carotid high-signal plaques using 3D TSE T1-BB VWI vs. Manual segmentation of carotid high-signal plaques was evaluated on Correlation, inter-rater reproducibility (ICC), and segmentation time for high-signal plaque (HSP) volume quantification (r = 0.965; Inter-rater ICC 0.998 vs 0.959, p=<0.01). Semiautomated segmentation of carotid high-signal plaques correlated strongly with manual segmentation (r = 0.965), improved inter-rater ICC (0.998 vs 0.959), and reduced segmentation time (81.7 vs 189.5 s; p < 0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: