Why the study?
Does right heart catheterization improve outcomes in critically ill patients?
Does right heart catheterization improve outcomes in critically ill patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The author argues that current observational data on right heart catheterization in critically ill patients is insufficient and calls for a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Comment: I cannot say more about this study (or say anything better) than what Ken Tuman and I wrote in a recent editorial.1 I believe this study adds nothing to the database we already had, and it accentuates the problem that we have with right heart catheterization which is: knowing when and where it is appropriate to perform right heart catheterization and treat the patient based on derived values. Clearly, we need a prospective, randomized, controlled study that is free of all the biases of observational studies (like this one) and cross-overs that the usual studies have (like many in the literature).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Connors et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: