This article studies a one-period two-party supply chain with a service requirement. At the beginning of a single retail season, the retailer can obtain goods by either ordering from a firm or by purchasing and exercising call options. The retailer’s optimal ordering policy and the supplier’s optimal production policy are derived in the presence of options contracts and a service requirement. In addition, it is shown that options contracts benefit both the retailer and supplier. Furthermore, it is shown that the retailer’s optimal expected profit is non-increasing in the service requirement and the supplier’s optimal expected profit is non-decreasing in the service requirement, either with or without options contracts. A special class of distribution-free contracts that can coordinate the supply chain with options contracts and the service requirement are derived. Furthermore, as opposed to the case of non-coordinating contracts, it is shown that there is always a Pareto contract. Finally, the retailer’s and supply chain’s optimal service level are derived.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: