Key result
Absolute peak values of oxygen uptake (VO2) significantly correlated with peak heart rate (R=0.45), cardiac output (R=0.33), and left cardiac work index (R=0.40) measured by impedance cardiography.
Why the study?
Physical capacity in CAD varies based on atherosclerosis extent and individual hemodynamic response to exercise, prompting evaluation of the relationship between CPET exercise capacity parameters and ICG hemodynamics.
Cross-Sectional (n=54)
No
Impedance cardiography is a reliable noninvasive method that correlates with cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameters, providing additional hemodynamic insights into exercise capacity in CAD patients.
Background Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) are characterized by different levels of physical capacity, which depends not only on the anatomical advancement of atherosclerosis, but also on the individual cardiovascular hemodynamic response to exercise. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between parameters of exercise capacity assessed via cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and impedance cardiography (ICG) hemodynamics in patients with CAD. Methods Exercise capacity was assessed in 54 patients with CAD (41 men, aged 59.5 ± 8.6 years) within 6 weeks after revascularization by means of oxygen uptake (VO 2 ), assessed via CPET, and hemodynamic parameters (heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), left cardiac work index (LCWi)), measured by ICG. Correlations between these parameters at anaerobic threshold (AT) and at the peak of exercise as well as their changes (Δpeak–rest, Δpeak–AT) were evaluated. Results A large proportion of patients exhibited reduced exercise capacity, with 63% not reaching 80% of predicted peak VO 2 . Clinically relevant correlations were noted between the absolute peak values of VO 2 vs. HR, VO 2 vs. CO, and VO 2 vs. LCWi (R = 0.45, p = 0.0005; R = 0.33, p = 0.015; and R = 0.40, p = 0.003, respectively). There was no correlation between AT VO 2 and hemodynamic parameters at the AT time point. Furthermore ΔVO 2 (peak–AT) correlated with ΔHR(peak–AT), ΔCO(peak–AT) and ΔLCWi(peak–AT) (R = 0.52, p < 0.0001, R = 0.49, p = 0.0001; and R = 0.49, p = 0.0001, respectively). ΔVO 2 (peak–rest) correlated with ΔHR(peak–rest), ΔCO(peak–rest), and ΔLCWi(peak–rest) (R = 0.47, p < 0.0001; R = 0.41, p = 0.002; and R = 0.43, p = 0.001, respectively). Conclusion ICG is a reliable method of assessing the cardiovascular response to exercise in patients with CAD. Some ICG parameters show definite correlations with parameters of cardiovascular capacity of proven clinical utility, such as peak VO 2 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kurpaska et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery disease (n=54). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and impedance cardiography was evaluated on Correlation between absolute peak values of VO2 and peak heart rate (R=0.45, p=0.0005). Absolute peak values of oxygen uptake (VO2) significantly correlated with peak heart rate (R=0.45), cardiac output (R=0.33), and left cardiac work index (R=0.40) measured by impedance cardiography.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: