Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the fertility response and concurrent follicular dynamics and hormonal profiles of cyclic and acyclic high lactating Holstein cows to PRID Modified (PRID-synch) protocol in comparison with Basic-Ovsynch protocol (control). Methods: Forty cyclic and forty acyclic cows were subjected to modified PRID-sync and Basic-Ovysynch (control) protocols. The cows subjected to the modified PRID-synch included 20 out of cyclic cows (cPRID-synch) and 20 out of acyclic cows (acPRID-synch). Similarly, the cows subjected to Basic-ovsync included 20 out of the cyclic cows (cBasic-ovsynch) and 20 out of the acyclic cows (acBasich-ovsynch). The fertility response and concurrent follicular dynamics, circulating levels of progesterone (on Days 0, 3, and 5), E2, and insulin (on Days 7, 8, 9, and 10) were evaluated. Results: In cyclic cows, the conception rate was numerically higher in cPRID-synch than cBasic-ovsynch (50% versus 30%). The conception rate did not differ between acPRID-synch and acBasic-ovsynch (30% versus 20%) in acyclic cows. The largest follicle diameter (LFD) was greater (P<0.05) in cBasic-Ovsynch than cPRID-synch on Days 7, 8, and 9 but did not differ between the two groups on Day10. The LFD did not differ (P>0.05) between acPRID-synch and acBasic-Ovsynch on Days 9 and 10 but, on Days7 and 8, it was greater (P<0.05) in acBasic-Ovsynch than acPRID-synch. Conclusion: It could be concluded that supplementation of P4 via PRID insertion, on Days 0-7 in the ovsynch protocol in cyclic or acyclic cows improves fertility response with higher response in cyclic cows than acyclic cows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramoun et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: