Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The self-assembly of Cu(I) ions with N -[( E )-(4-chlorophenyl)methylidene]-4 H -1,2,4-triazol-4-amine (L1) and various spacer ligands yields five different crystalline species: ∞ 1 {[Cu 2 (μ-L1) 2 (μ-L2)(CH 3 CN) 2 ](ClO 4 ) 2 } ( 3 ) (L2 = pyrazine), ∞ 1 {[Cu(L1)(μ-L3)(CH 3 CN)](ClO 4 )} ( 4 ) and ∞ 1 {[Cu(L1) 2 (μ-L3)](ClO 4 )} ( 5 ) (L3 = 4,4′- bipyridyl), ∞ 3 {[Cu 2 (μ-L1) 2 (μ-L4) 2 ][Cu(μ-L4) 3/2 (CH 3 CN)] 2 (ClO 4 ) 4 ·6CH 3 CN} ( 6 ) and ∞ 2 {[Cu 2 (μ-L1) 2 (μ-L4) 3 (CH 3 CN)](ClO 4 ) 2 ·CH 3 CN} ( 7 ) (L4 = 1,4-bis(3-pyridyl)-2,3-diaza-1,3-butadiene). Complexes 3 − 5 are zigzag polymeric one-dimensional (1D) chains, 7 shows a two-dimensional (2D) layered structure, whereas 6 forms a three-dimensional (3D) polymeric structure. In crystals of 3 and 7, the nodes of the polymers are formed by two copper(I) ions bridged by two N 1, N 2 -coordinated triazole ligands L1. Such a coordination mode was previously observed for dimeric complexes {[Cu 2 (L1) 4 ](ClO 4 ) 2 }·2CH 3 CN ( 1 ) and {[Cu 2 (L1) 4 (CH 3 CN) 2 ](ClO 4 ) 2 }·CH 3 CN ( 2 ), and the {Cu-(μ-L1) 2 -Cu} fragment can be treated as a secondary building unit (SBU) of the polymers. On the other hand, in 4 and 5 the ligands L1 are bound in a monodentate fashion. In 6 two different copper sites are detected: one with SBU coordination mode, while in the other one the metal atom is tetrahedrally coordinated to three L4 spacer ligands and to the acetonitrile molecule. When using L5 as a spacer ligand (L5 = 1,4-bis(4-pyridyl)-2,3-diaza-1,3-butadiene), the microcrystalline product 8 of formula {[Cu(L5) 2 ](ClO 4 )·H 2 O} is formed. Irrespective of the metal/L1/L5 molar ratio, no triazole ligand in the final product is observed. The propensity for Cu(I) networks to undergo transitions from a more kinetic to a more thermodynamic product ( 1 to 2 and 4 to 5 ) is demonstrated. The role of spacer ligand L4 conformation on metal···metal separation is discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Drabent et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: