Why the study?
Do different anaesthetic techniques provide varying haemodynamic stability during induction and sternotomy in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery?
Do different anaesthetic techniques provide varying haemodynamic stability during induction and sternotomy in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery?
Different anaesthetic techniques offer varying profiles of haemodynamic stability during different phases of anaesthesia induction and sternotomy in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Different agents yield phase-specific haemodynamic stability in CABG; leaves open optimal regimen pending randomized trials.
A comparison of haemodynamic stability with respect to arterial pressure, heart rate and cardiac output between six commonly used anaesthetic techniques: fentanyl (FE), halothane (HAL), morphine (MO), fentanyl/droperidol (NLA), and thiopentone (two dose levels: PE 3 and PE 6), all supplemented with nitrous oxide, was performed during induction of anaesthesia and sternotomy in 47 patients with good left ventricular function and maintained beta-blockers undergoing coronary bypass surgery. Interventions were kept to a minimum in order to characterize each anaesthesia group. Statistically, the material fell into two parts. The MO, PE 3 and PE 6 groups showed good stability under steady-state anaesthesia, but variable and often extensive hyperdynamic responses were seen to endotracheal intubation and surgical stimulation. The FE, HAL and NLA groups were characterized by a good stability during the induction-intubation phase but were unstable when combined with nitrous oxide in the absence of noxious stimuli.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milocco et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: