Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Following mechanical shredding of spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), the complex composition of electrode materials hinders subsequent recycling. Thus, the separation of cathode and anode materials is a crucial step in the recycling process. The separation efficiency of cathode and anode materials under the two pretreatment methods of oxygen-free roasting and water soaking was analyzed by testing and calculation. Based on the different pyrolysis characteristics, the pretreatment process through oxygen-free roasting achieved high-purity separation, yielding anode and cathode materials with purities of 98.5 % and 93.3 %, respectively. By exploiting the water solubility differences of the binders, soaking the electrode sheets in water for 75 min followed by 40 KHz frequency ultrasonication for 1 min before sieving results in a purity of up to 98.7 % for the anode material and 98.1 % for the cathode material. Additionally, the anode material’s lithium leaching rate during water soaking separation is 82.9 %, supplying raw material for cathode repair and regeneration. Furthermore, the initial charge–discharge specific capacity of cathode material separated by water soaking is around 150 mAh/g after lithium replenishment, which is significantly higher than that of cathode material separated by oxygen-free calcination. A novel process for separating cathode and anode materials through water soaking and ultrasonic vibration was ultimately developed. This process not only enables the efficient separation of LiFePO 4 cathode materials but also facilitates their high-value regeneration. This method offers a scalable and environmentally sustainable approach to LIB recycling, with potential applications in industrial-scale battery material recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: