Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Limited data exist comparing inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) plus adjunctive therapy vs ICS alone in pediatric asthma patients. Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) vs FF in children and adolescents with asthma. Methods This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study (NCT03248128) included participants aged 5 to 17 years with six months or more asthma history uncontrolled on ICS monotherapy. Participants received 4-week open-label fluticasone propionate (100 µg) twice daily before 1:1 randomization to 24-week double-blind FF (50 µg:100 µg) or FF/VI (50/25 µg:100/25 µg) once daily. Two populations with different primary endpoints were analyzed to meet United States (week 12 weighted mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV 1 ; 0-4 hours]; participants aged 5–17 years) and European (change from baseline predose morning peak expiratory flow [ΔAM PEF] averaged over weeks 1-12; participants aged 5-11 years) regulatory requirements. Results Overall, 902 participants, including 673 children aged 5 to 11 years, were randomized and treated. In participants aged 5 to 17, week 12 weighted mean FEV 1 (0-4 hours) was greater with FF/VI vs FF (difference: 0.083 L; P < .001). In participants aged 5 to 11, ΔAM PEF over weeks 1 to 12 showed numerical improvement with FF/VI vs FF but was not statistically significant (difference: 3.2 L/min; P = .228). No drug-related serious adverse events or deaths were reported. Conclusion FF/VI significantly improved weighted mean FEV 1 (0-4 hours; participants aged 5-17 years), but not ΔAM PEF (participants aged 5-11 years) vs FF. No new safety concerns were apparent. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03248128.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bareille et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: