Key result
Carotid stenosis is associated with cognitive impairment and depressive symptoms, but the effects of carotid revascularization on neurocognitive function remain controversial and require further research.
Why the study?
Existing reviews focused narrowly on cognitive deficits rather than the full spectrum of mental and cognitive correlations with carotid stenosis, and findings on the neuropsychological effects of carotid revascularization remain controversial.
Does carotid revascularization improve cognitive function and psychological condition in patients with carotid artery stenosis?
Does carotid revascularization improve cognitive function and psychological condition in patients with carotid artery stenosis?
The impact of carotid revascularization on cognitive and mental disorders remains controversial, suggesting that treatment decisions should currently remain focused on stroke prevention.
Revascularization decisions should prioritize stroke prevention; leaves open neurocognitive effects pending prospective trials.
Carotid stenosis constitutes a common vascular disease that significantly affects cerebral blood flow and thus is associated with patients' cognitive functions. Carotid revascularization techniques [carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS)] may benefit cognition, though there are opposing findings, reporting an apparent decrement in cognitive function, no effect, or an apparent improvement after revascularization. A great number of studies are trying to evaluate the effect of carotid revascularization (CEA, CAS) on patients' cognitive functions, as well as on their psychological condition and quality of life through a baseline and follow-up neuropsychological examination. Recent reviews refer only to the narrow limits of cognitive deficits that may be attributed to carotid stenosis, rather than elucidating the outfit of all aspects of mental and cognitive correlations. Most of those findings depict controversy in current literature as far as the neuropsychological effects of carotid revascularization techniques are concerned, while clinical entities of "vascular dementia" and "vascular depression", as well as intercurrent vascular risk factors are also addressed. This might be taken into consideration, when determining the optimal therapeutic strategy for tackling carotid artery occlusive disease, while best practice clinical decisions should be still focused on stroke prevention and symptoms alleviation, until further research on the field of neuroangiology presents undisputable conclusions regarding the underlying effects of revascularization on mood and cognition. Τhe neurovascular interface, as far as mental and neurocognitive impact of carotid stenosis is concerned, also, comprises, the conceptual pathophysiological entity of "atheroinflammation", underscoring the association of vascular lesions with cognitive impairment, major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. Chronic recurrent ischemia and chronic low perfusion are also addressed from neurocognitive aspect, regarding therapeutic strategies that might be preferred so as to reduce the burden of chronic cerebrovascular disease in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, given the fact that inflammatory processes of vascular complexion underlie both neuroinflammation and atherosclerosis, affecting cerebral perfusion as well as cortical blood flow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christos Ch Liapis (2022) conducted a review in Carotid artery disease, mental and neurocognitive disorders. Carotid revascularization (Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting) was evaluated. Carotid stenosis is associated with cognitive impairment and depressive symptoms, but the effects of carotid revascularization on neurocognitive function remain controversial and require further research.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: