Key result
Bedside pocket-sized ultrasound demonstrated high accuracy (93% to 98%) and significant correlation with CT scans for detecting pleural, pericardial, and intra-abdominal effusions.
Why the study?
This study aimed to evaluate the bedside use of a pocket-sized ultrasound device for detecting intracavitary effusions.
Does bedside ultrasound using a pocket-sized device accurately detect and estimate intracavitary effusions compared to CT scans in hospitalized patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=40)
No
Does bedside ultrasound using a pocket-sized device accurately detect and estimate intracavitary effusions compared to CT scans in hospitalized patients?
Effect estimate: Accuracy 93-98%
p-value: p=< 1×10-38
Bedside ultrasound using a pocket-sized device is highly accurate and correlates well with CT scans for detecting and estimating intracavitary effusions.
May support bedside effusion screening in inpatients; leaves open prospective outcome validation.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the bedside use of the pocket-sized ultrasound (US) device for the detection of the intracavitary effusions. METHODS: We randomly enrolled 40 patients admitted to S. Andrea Hospital of Rome. Every patient received a clinical and biochemical evaluation and a bedside US examination to detect and estimate the intracavitary (pleural, pericardial and intra-abdominal) effusions; the US measurements have been compared to the computed tomography (CT) scans (as gold standard). RESULTS: The patients presented a high prevalence of effusions: right pleural 16/40 = 40% (esteemed volume 236.3±500.7 ml, mean±standard deviation m±SD), left pleural 8/40 = 20% (127.0±377.4 ml), pericardial 12/40 = 30% (47.5±72.8 ml) and intra-abdominal effusions 5/40 = 12.5% of cases (110.9±600.6 ml). Linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between US and CT measurements: pleural r = 0.973 p < 1×10-38, pericardial r = 0.927 p < 1×10-39, intra-abdominal space r = 0.921 p < 1×10-59. The accuracy of the bedside US at the pleural, pericardial and abdominal level was respectively 98%, 93% and 96% (Cohen's kappa coefficient 0.966, 0.841 and 0.833). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed a high prevalence of the intracavitary effusions and a high accuracy of the bedside US. The bedside US by a pocket-sized device is promising tool for its advantages of reproducibility and non-invasiveness of the device.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martocchia et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Intracavitary effusions (n=40). Bedside pocket-sized ultrasound vs. Computed tomography (CT) scan was evaluated on Detection and estimation of intracavitary effusions compared to CT (Accuracy 93-98%, p=< 1×10-38). Bedside pocket-sized ultrasound demonstrated high accuracy (93% to 98%) and significant correlation with CT scans for detecting pleural, pericardial, and intra-abdominal effusions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: