Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Understanding how metals deposit at electrified solid−liquid interfaces is essential to electrochemistry, yet the molecular mechanism of electrodeposition has remained largely unresolved due to the intrinsic opacity of buried interfaces. Here, we combine operando, interface-sensitive soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy with first-principles electronic-structure simulations to directly track copper electrodeposition on gold with elemental and chemical specificity. A newly developed lock-in total electron yield detection scheme enables selective probing of the topmost nanometers of an operating electrochemical interface, overcoming long-standing limitations imposed by Faradaic currents. Using this approach, we find unambiguous evidence that copper deposition does not proceed through classical outer- or inner-sphere electron-transfer pathways, but instead follows an atom-transfer mechanism mediated by a transient cuprous oxide (Cu2O) layer. This Cu(I) oxide forms at moderate cathodic potentials at pH ∼4.5 and subsequently reduces to Cu0, establishing a stepwise sequence governed by interfacial chemistry rather than direct electron transfer. Our results redefine the mechanistic landscape of metal electrodeposition and establish a generalizable platform for resolving complex electrochemical transformations at buried interfaces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeller et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: