Key result
Active video game supplementation during cardiac rehabilitation was feasible and safe, showing a non-significant trend toward lower dropout (6% vs 19%, P>0.05) compared to conventional exercise.
Why the study?
Does active video game supplementation improve adherence and safety in low-moderate risk cardiac rehabilitation participants?
RCT (n=32)
evaluator-blinded
randomized
Does active video game supplementation improve adherence and safety in low-moderate risk cardiac rehabilitation participants?
Absolute Event Rate: 6% vs 19%
p-value: p=> .05
Active video game supplementation during cardiac rehabilitation is safe and improves daily physical activity, suggesting a promising strategy to enhance adherence.
Offers a safe adjunct to traditional cardiac rehabilitation; leaves open whether gamification definitively improves long.
PURPOSE: The application of active video games (AVGs) during cardiac rehabilitation (CR) sessions could potentially facilitate patient adherence. The feasibility, safety, and efficacy of in-class AVG supplementation as an alternative to conventional phase 2 programs were investigated. METHODS: A pilot, evaluator-blinded, intention-to-treat, randomized controlled trial recruited 32 low-moderate risk CR participants and allocated them to conventional or AVG-supplemented exercise. Both groups experienced equal exercise loads for 6 weeks. Patients were assessed at baseline, end of the program, and after an 8-week followup. Adherence and safety-related outcomes were the primary endpoints. Secondary outcomes included change in exercise capacity, daily physical activity (PA), energy expenditure (EE), and psychometric profiling. RESULTS: Patients (males 81%; 60 ± 10 years) presented with typical cardiovascular risk factors and similar baseline characteristics. Participants did not perceive an increased risk of injury and were more interactive. At the end of the program, there was a lower tendency for dropping out (6% vs 19%, P > .05), a significant improvement in PA (322 vs 247 arbitrary acceleration units/min, P = .047) and related EE per body weight (13 vs 11 kcal/kg/d, P = .04) among AVG participants compared with controls. No significant differences between groups for adverse medical events, exercise capacity, affect toward exercise, anxiety, depression, or quality-of-life changes were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The additional use of AVGs during CR sessions is feasible, safe, and significantly improved daily PA and EE. A dropout reduction trend among its users, which needs to be confirmed in a larger trial, raises awareness to AVG supplementation as a promising strategy to increase CR adherence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruivo et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in cardiac rehabilitation (n=32). In-class active video game (AVG) supplementation vs. Conventional phase 2 programs was evaluated on Adherence (dropout rate) and safety-related outcomes (p=> .05). Active video game supplementation during cardiac rehabilitation was feasible and safe, showing a non-significant trend toward lower dropout (6% vs 19%, P>0.05) compared to conventional exercise.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: