Feedback processes in the carbon budget are investigated in a manner that parallels the treatment of feedback processes in the energy budget. The analysis is applied to simulations with the CCCma earth system model CanESM1 using a range of emission scenarios. For the atmosphere there is a positive “carbon‐temperature” feedback which acts to increase CO 2 flux to the atmosphere as temperatures warm. There is also a negative “carbon‐concentration” feedback which acts to remove CO 2 from the atmosphere via enhanced uptake of CO 2 by the land and ocean as CO 2 concentration increases. While the positive feedback associated with temperature change is reasonably linear and consistent as temperature increases, the feedback associated with CO 2 concentration is not. The negative carbon‐concentration feedback weakens with increasing CO 2 concentration thereby enhancing atmospheric CO 2 and accelerating global warming. The behaviour of the inferred carbon‐concentration feedback is different for different emission scenarios implying a dependence on state variables other than CO 2 concentration. The carbon‐concentration feedback behaviour inferred for a particular scenario may not, therefore, be used to infer system behaviour for other scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boer et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: