Key result
In patients with suspected AMI and highly abnormal baseline hs-cTnT (>80 ng/L), adding serial sampling did not meaningfully improve the positive predictive value for AMI diagnosis (87.1% vs 88.9% at 2h).
Why the study?
Does initial hs-cTnT alone provide similar diagnostic accuracy for acute myocardial infarction compared to serial sampling in patients with highly abnormal baseline concentrations?
Observational (n=1,282)
Does initial hs-cTnT alone provide similar diagnostic accuracy for acute myocardial infarction compared to serial sampling in patients with highly abnormal baseline concentrations?
In patients with suspected AMI and highly abnormal initial hs-cTnT concentrations (>80 ng/L), serial sampling does not provide incremental diagnostic value for predicting AMI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Initial hs-cTnT >80 ng/L may suffice for AMI diagnosis; leaves open whether serial sampling protocols can be safely de-emphasized in this subgroup.
BACKGROUND: Guidelines for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) recommend adding kinetic changes to the initial cardiac troponin (cTn) blood concentration to improve AMI diagnosis. We hypothesized that kinetic changes may not be required in patients presenting with highly abnormal cTn. METHODS: Patients presenting with suspected AMI to the emergency department were enrolled in a prospective diagnostic study. We assessed the positive predictive value (PPV) of initial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) blood concentrations alone and in combination with kinetic changes for AMI. Predefined relative changes (δ change of ≥20%) and absolute changes (Δ change ≥9.2 ng/L) within different time intervals (1 h, 2 h, and 4-14 h after presentation) were assessed. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists. RESULTS: Among 1282 patients, 213 (16.6%) patients had a final diagnosis of AMI. For AMI prediction, PPVs increased from 48.8% for an initial hs-cTnT >14 ng/L to 87.2% for >60 ng/L, whereas PPVs remained unchanged for higher hs-cTnT concentrations at baseline (87.1% for both >80 ng/L and >100 ng/L). With addition of 20% relative Δ change, PPVs were not further improved in patients with baseline hs-cTnT >80 ng/L using the 1-h (84.0%) and 2-h (88.9%) intervals, and only minimally when extending the interval to 4-14 h (91.2% for >80 ng/L and 90.4% for >100 ng/L, respectively). Similar findings were observed when applying absolute changes. CONCLUSIONS: In chest pain patients with highly abnormal hs-cTnT concentrations at presentation, subsequent blood draws may not be required, as they do not provide incremental diagnostic value for prediction of AMI diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mueller‐Hennessen et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Suspected acute myocardial infarction (n=1,282). Initial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) alone vs. Initial hs-cTnT in combination with kinetic changes (serial sampling) was evaluated on Positive predictive value (PPV) for acute myocardial infarction diagnosis. In patients with suspected AMI and highly abnormal baseline hs-cTnT (>80 ng/L), adding serial sampling did not meaningfully improve the positive predictive value for AMI diagnosis (87.1% vs 88.9% at 2h).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: