Key result
Combined neprilysin/RAS inhibition significantly reduced the composite of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization compared with ACE inhibition alone (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.76-0.97; P=0.013).
Why the study?
Does combined neprilysin/RAS inhibition reduce all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization in patients with HFrEF compared to ACE inhibition alone?
Meta-Analysis (n=14,742)
Yes
Does combined neprilysin/RAS inhibition reduce all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization in patients with HFrEF compared to ACE inhibition alone?
Hazard Ratio: 0.86 (95% CI 0.76–0.97)
p-value: p=0.013
Combined neprilysin/RAS inhibition significantly reduces the composite of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization and all-cause mortality compared to ACE inhibition alone in patients with HFrEF.
Supports preferring combined neprilysin/RAS inhibition over ACEI in HFrEF; confirms superiority via pooled RCT evidence.
AIMS: The combined neprilysin/renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan reduced cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality in a large outcomes trial. While sacubitril/valsartan is the only currently available drug in its class, there are two prior clinical trials in heart failure with omapatrilat, another combined neprilysin/RAS inhibitor. Using all available evidence can inform clinicians and policy-makers. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a meta-analysis using data from three trials in heart failure with reduced EF that compared combined neprilysin/RAS inhibition with RAS inhibition alone and reported clinical outcomes: IMPRESS (n = 573), OVERTURE (n = 5770), and PARADIGM-HF (n = 8399). We assessed the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization, and for all-cause mortality in random-effects models, comparing combined neprilysin/RAS inhibition with ACE inhibition alone. The composite outcome of death or heart failure hospitalization was reduced numerically in patients receiving combined neprilysin/RAS inhibition in all three trials, with a pooled HR of 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.97, P = 0.013. For the endpoint of all-cause mortality, the pooled HR was 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.98, P = 0.021. Combined neprilysin/RAS inhibition compared with ACE inhibition was associated with more hypotension, but less renal dysfunction and hyperkalaemia in all three trials. CONCLUSIONS: Pooled estimates from three trials with two separate drugs of combined neprilysin/RAS inhibition support the use of combined neprilysin/RAS inhibition in heart failure with reduced EF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Solomon et al. (2016) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n=14,742). Combined neprilysin/renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibition vs. ACE inhibition alone was evaluated on All-cause death or heart failure hospitalization (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76-0.97, p=0.013). Combined neprilysin/RAS inhibition significantly reduced the composite of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization compared with ACE inhibition alone (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.76-0.97; P=0.013).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: