Key result
Novel thrombotic biomarkers show promise for improving thrombosis risk assessment in cancer patients.
Why the study?
Venous thromboembolism incidence is higher in oncologic patients and biomarkers have been used to improve thrombotic risk stratification in this population.
No evaluable data on oncologic thrombotic biomarkers; leaves open their risk-stratification utility.
Introduction Primary and recurrent venous thromboembolism–persists as a source of major morbidity and mortality. Although frequent in general population, the incidence of venous thromboembolism among oncologic patients is roughly higher, and expected to keep rising not only due to prevalence of cancer and the ageing of occidental population, but also due to an enhanced detection of incidental thrombosis during follow-up and the thrombogenecity of some chemotherapeutic regimens. Because of the potential life-threatening nature of venous thromboembolism, oncologic patients might benefit from thromboprophylaxis. Therefore, in the last years, efforts have been made to help clinicians in the prevention and management of thrombotic events in cancer patients. In this way, some biomarkers have been used to create stratification risk scores, joined with clinical characteristics, and in this review we pursue to demonstrate the main thrombotic risk biomarkers related to cancer. Conclusion The widely used Khorana risk assessment model has been expanded by adding sP-selectin and D-dimer. Other biomarkers showing some improvement in thrombotic risk assessment as factor VIII (with a dose-related increased risk), elevated peak thrombin (defined as thrombin values = 611 nM), tissue factor or C-reactive protein have yielded promising results. However, the absence of widespread clinical availability of tests measuring these biomarkers, the lack of standardisation and their cost make their implementation in daily practice difficult.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cerezo-Manchado et al. (2013) conducted a review in Venous thromboembolism in oncologic patients. Thrombotic risk biomarkers (e.g., sP-selectin, D-dimer, factor VIII, peak thrombin) was evaluated. Biomarkers such as sP-selectin, D-dimer, factor VIII, and peak thrombin show promise for improving thrombotic risk assessment in oncologic patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: