Key result
Aspirin therapy for cardiovascular protection in patients with diabetes and cardiometabolic syndrome remains controversial, with this review examining clinical trial data and potential mechanisms.
Why the study?
Does aspirin prevent cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes or the cardiometabolic syndrome?
Does aspirin prevent cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes or the cardiometabolic syndrome?
This review examines the controversial role of aspirin for cardiovascular protection in patients with diabetes and cardiometabolic syndrome.
Aspirin use in diabetes and cardiometabolic syndrome warrants caution; leaves open the need for definitive RCTs.
Paralleling the rise in obesity, the cardiometabolic syndrome is a rapidly growing health problem in the United States. There is a 3-fold increase in the prevalence of coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke due to the coagulation, hemodynamic, and metabolic abnormalities seen in these individuals. The use of aspirin for secondary prevention and, to a lesser degree, primary prevention of cardiovascular events is a well-established standard of care. However, in patients with diabetes or the cardiometabolic syndrome, the role of aspirin in prevention of cardiovascular events remains controversial. In this review, the authors examine the clinical trial data on the use of aspirin in diabetes and the cardiometabolic syndrome for cardiovascular protection. They also explore, in addition to aspirin's effects on platelet aggregation, some of the mechanisms by which aspirin may favorably alter the course of atherosclerosis, effects on endothelial function, and glycemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gardner et al. (2009) conducted a review in Cardiometabolic syndrome and diabetes. Aspirin was evaluated. Aspirin therapy for cardiovascular protection in patients with diabetes and cardiometabolic syndrome remains controversial, with this review examining clinical trial data and potential mechanisms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: