Randomized trial demonstrates superior pain relief and functional recovery with shock wave therapy in degenerative rotator cuff tears, highlighting an efficient noninvasive alternative.
Background/Objectives: Non-traumatic (degenerative) rotator cuff tendinopathy with partial supraspinatus tear (NT-RCTT) is a common source of shoulder pain and disability. Comparative evidence between radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) and multimodal physical therapy modalities (PTMs) remains scarce. Methods: In this single-center randomized controlled trial, 60 adults with MRI-confirmed NT-RCTT were assigned (1:1) to rESWT (one session weekly for six weeks; 2000 impulses per session, 2 bar air pressure, positive energy flux density 0.08 mJ/mm2; 8 impulses per second) or a multimodal PTM program (interferential current, shortwave diathermy and magnetothermal therapy; five sessions weekly for six weeks). All participants performed standardized home exercises. The primary outcome was the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) total score; secondary outcomes included pain (visual analog scale, VAS), satisfaction, range of motion (ROM), supraspinatus tendon (ST) thickness and acromiohumeral distance (AHD). Assessments were conducted at baseline, and at week 6 (W6) and week 12 (W12) post-baseline. Results: Both interventions significantly improved all outcomes, but rESWT produced greater and faster effects. Mean ASES total scores increased by 31 ± 5 points with rESWT versus 26 ± 6 with PTMs (p < 0.05). VAS pain decreased from 5.2 ± 0.7 to 1.0 ± 0.7 with rESWT and from 5.2 ± 0.8 to 1.7 ± 0.8 with PTMs (p < 0.01). rESWT achieved higher satisfaction and larger gains in abduction, flexion and external rotation. Ultrasound showed reduced ST thickness and increased AHD after rESWT but not after PTMs. No serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions: rESWT yielded superior pain relief, functional recovery and tendon remodeling compared with a multimodal PTM program, with markedly lower treatment time and excellent tolerability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: