Why the study?
Does antiplatelet therapy provide a favorable benefit-risk ratio regarding vascular event prevention versus bleeding complications in patients with prior TIA or stroke?
Does antiplatelet therapy provide a favorable benefit-risk ratio regarding vascular event prevention versus bleeding complications in patients with prior TIA or stroke?
Antiplatelet therapy for secondary stroke prevention provides a net clinical benefit, preventing more ischaemic vascular events than the excess fatal or severe bleeds it causes.
May support net benefit for secondary prevention after TIA or stroke; leaves open optimal regimens in contemporary populations.
This review analyses the benefit-risk ratio of antiplatelet drugs in secondary stroke prevention and is based on the published data from eight large stroke prevention trials. In patients with prior transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or stroke, aspirin prevented one to two vascular events (stroke, AMI, or vascular death) per 100 treatment-years with an excess risk of fatal and severe bleeds of 0. 4-0.6 per 100 treatment-years. The gastrointestinal bleeding risk was significantly lower with ticlopidine and clopidogrel, which were both somewhat more effective than aspirin in the prevention of vascular events. The combination of dipyridamole and aspirin prevented 2.82 strokes at the expense of an excess risk of 0.61 (95% CI = 0.27-0.95) fatal or severe bleeds per 100 treatment-years. In the acute phase of stroke, the aspirin-associated risk of haemorrhagic complications was much increased compared with that in the stable phase after stroke, with 0.48 (95% CI = 0.13-0.83) fatal or severe bleeds per 100 treated patients for the first 4 weeks after stroke in the Chinese Acute Stroke Trial and 0.41 (95% CI = 0. 05-0.77) in the International Stroke Trial. Still, there was a net benefit with the prevention of about one death or non-fatal ischaemic stroke per 100 treated patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gudrun Boysen (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: