Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Sepsis affects millions of people and imposes a substantial economic and social burden worldwide. However, the role of human albumin in the management of septic patients remains unclear. METHODS: EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials regarding the use of human albumin in septic patients were eligible. The overall mortality and the intensive care unit (ICU), in-hospital/28-day, and 90-day mortality were pooled, respectively. Subgroup analyses were performed according to target population, type and dose of human albumin, and type of control group. Risk ratios (RRs) was calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-four randomized controlled trials were finally included. Meta-analysis showed that human albumin cannot decrease the overall (RR = 1.02, P = .56), ICU (RR = 1.06, P = .65), in-hospital/28-day (RR = 1.01, P = .68), and 90-day (RR = 1.01, P = .65) mortality of total patients. Subgroup analyses showed that human albumin both cannot significantly decrease the overall, ICU, in-hospital/28-day, and 90-day mortality of sepsis and septic patients. Additionally, 20% human albumin (RR = 0.89, P = .03) and high daily dose of human albumin (RR = 0.90, P = .03) might benefit for the survival of patients with septic shock. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current evidence, the general use of human albumin to improve the survival of septic patients cannot be recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bai et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: